International environmental agreements: A survey of their features, formation, and effects. Berkeley: University of California Press. Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Kailas histories: Renunciate traditions and the construction of Hiamlayan sacred geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416–432. Darier (Ed.), Discourses of the environment (pp. Environmentality as green governmentality. Postcolonial international relations: Conquest and desire between Asia and the West. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.
The mountain politicats how to#
Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Humla Conservation and Development Association. American Political Science Review, 95, 1–13. Governance in a partially globalized world.
Geographical diversions: Tibetan trade, global transactions. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Institutions for the earth: Sources of effective international environmental protection.
Imperial nature: The World Bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization. Power and resistance in the new world order. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. Ivanova (Eds.), Global environmental governance: Options and opportunities (pp. Revitalizing global environmental governance: A function-driven approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Įsty, D., & Ivanova, M. Barnett (Eds.), Power and global governance (pp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.ĭuvall, R., & Barnett, M. The mountain: A political history from the enlightenment to the present. Dissertation, New School for Social Research.ĭebarbieux, B., & Rudaz, G. (2019) Social movements and earthbound people: Towards a new politics of the Earth in the Anthropocene. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Ĭrews, C. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond ‘Politics’. Transforming the frontier: Peace parks and the politics of neoliberal conservation in Southern Africa. Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Oxford: Oxford University Press.īurke, A., Fishel, S., Mitchell, A., et al. New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Ontology and indigeneity: On the political ontology of heterogenous assemblages. Worlding, ontological politics and the possibility of a decolonial IR. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 57–61.īlaney, D., & Tickner, A. The anthropocene: A governance perspective. (Eds.), Sacred natural sites: Conserving nature and culture (pp. Sacred mountains and global changes: Impacts and responses.
Berkeley: University of California Press.īernbaum, E. Anarchy and the environment: The international relations of common pool resources. Stanford: Stanford University Press.īarkin, J. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Applied Research and Design Publishing.Īgrawal, A. Ganges water machine: Designing New India’s ancient river. Kailash in the Himalayas as a case study.Īcciavatti, A. Instead, in the service of finding a more politically plural, but also more multinatural, planetary politics, the chapter proposes an analytic and political focus on routes and routing, which better show the multiple mountains that are in play in these regions, drawing on the transboundary region surrounding Mt. It then suggests that sacredness is a particularly problematic way of rendering these multiple mountains as singular, in ways that undermine the very ends of mountain governance. Against a number of accounts of environmental governance, it first argues that mountains are multiple objects, not singular natural ones. This chapter enquires into the production of global mountains by secular governance regimes. One of its central organizing categories is the sacred landscape, which is neither a purely natural object nor a socially valuable one, but rather, an exceptional sacred one to be protected, conserved, and/or developed. Referencing the common ecological fates suffered by mountains around the world because of climate change, it aims to fuse ecological, political, and cultural perspectives together in a new political object. Mountain governance has emerged as new node of planetary management of non-human nature.
0 kommentar(er)
